On Tuesday, Becky Spratford featured The Best Books of 2026, So Far from the New York Times on her blog, RA for All.
On Tuesday April 28, Becky Spratford featured The
Best Books of 2026, So Far from the New
York Times on her blog, RA
for All. I recommend that you and your colleagues read through Becky’s
blog post. In it, she discusses how the
NYT book section is focusing on prioritizing the reader and what would appeal
to readers like our patrons.
There is nothing to add to Becky’s analysis. However, I would
suggest that you look over the NYT list after you read the blog post. The
titles of the various sections will make great titles for book displays. Several
examples - I want a lush historical novel about sisterhood, I want a fresh
perspective on familiar history,
I want a rivals-to-lovers road trip romance, and I love absorbing
biographies that bring icons to life – can likely be filled with titles from
your collection. Check for read-alikes for the exact titles on their list but
don’t worry about expanding your selections far from what the Times has listed;
the display is to market your collection, not to mirror the Times article
exactly.
I love the idea of just taking “I love” or “I want” and
creating a series of displays to run over a month or so in a library. You can
see what the Times has listed but then create your own. There are plenty of
tropes and plot points that you can select which will draw attention to your
backlist. Something like “I want a new twist on vampires” would have plenty of
recent examples such as The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones,
Reluctant Immortals by Gwendolyn Kiste, and Nestlings by Nat Cassidy.









